A workable scope identifies
- The conduct or events to be examined
- The policies, standards, or factual questions in issue
- The investigator, instructing contact, and decision maker
- The expected report, timeframe, and communication path
Guidance · Reviewed 28 July 2026
A defensible result begins before the first interview.
The process should move from a defined decision and fair scope to relevant evidence, tested accounts, reasoned findings, and a report that makes its limits clear.
Five stages
Identify immediate safety, reporting, support, conflict, authority, preservation, and legal-advice needs.
Define the allegations or factual questions, applicable material, deliverable, roles, timeframe, and decision maker.
Preserve and gather relevant records, identify witnesses, and plan interviews without assuming the answer.
Put material issues fairly, seek responses, resolve discrepancies where possible, and pursue relevant new lines of inquiry.
Explain the evidence, reasoning, findings, unresolved issues, and limits so the client can make its own decision.
The terms of reference
Quality controls
The Fair Work Ombudsman describes investigation as collecting and examining evidence before deciding whether workplace laws were followed. The Fair Work Commission’s guidance emphasises reasonable investigation and a fair opportunity to answer allegations. See the Fair Work Ombudsman investigation overview and Fair Work Commission guidance.
General information only
Start with contact details and the broad category. Do not send allegations, witness names, evidence, or health information initially.
This guide is not legal or industrial-relations advice. Tasmanian inquiry-agent licence number: TBA.